Full Text:

 

¿µ³²ÀÇ´ëÇмúÁö Vol.28 No.1 p45-53, June2011

Original Article

¿äÁß ÄÚƼ´Ñ ³óµµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Å¬·´ ÀÌ¿ëÀÚµéÀÇ °£Á¢Èí¿¬ ¼öÁØ Æò°¡

Estimation of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Clubs Based on Urinary Cotinine Levels

ÀÌÀ¯Áø, ÀÌ¿µÁö1, Àü¸¸Áß2, »ç°øÁØ2
±¹¸³Áß¾ÓÀÇ·á¿ø, ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ºÎ¼Óº´¿ø1, ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç2
±³½ÅÀúÀÚ£º»ç°øÁØ, ´ë±¸±¤¿ª½Ã ³²±¸ ´ë¸í5µ¿ 317-1, ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç
Tel: (053) 620-4372, Fax: (053) 623-4399
E-mail : jsakong@med.yu.ac.kr

June 30, 2011

Abstract

Background£ºIncreasing numbers of young people go to clubs. In Korea, however, no studies have been conducted regarding the exposure of club patrons to secondhand smoke. The present study was conducted to evaluate the degree of club customers¡¯ exposure to secondhand smoke.
Methods£ºThe study subjects included 10 male and 12 female non-smokers. The investigational site was a club located in Daegu. Urine samples were collected before exposure to secondhand smoke in the club and 6 hours after a 3-hour exposure. The urine cotinine levels were measured via the LC-MS/MS method. A survey was conducted to collect data regarding the subjects¡¯ smoking experiences and the degree of exposure to secondhand smoke in their daily lives.
Results£ºThe average urine cotinine level increased from 1.09 §¶/L to 5.55 §¶/L (p<0.05). No significant difference existed in the change in urine cotinine level between the male and female subjects. In addition, there was no significant difference in the change in urine cotinine level by the degree of exposure to secondhand smoke in daily life.
Conclusions£ºThe average urine cotinine level in all the subjects significantly increased after exposure to secondhand smoke. This is the first study on exposure to secondhand smoke in clubs; these results can be used to craft measures that reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in public places, such as clubs.

Key Words: Tobacco smoke pollution, Urine, Cotinine

References

1. Lee WC, Yim HW. Passive smoking. Korean J Med 1997;52 Suppl 1:34-40. Korean.

2. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans-tobacco smoking, Vol. 38, 1985.

3. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Current intelligence bulletine 54, environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace lung cancer and other health effects, NIOSH Publication No. 91-108. 1991.

4. Mackay J, Eriksen MP. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.

5. Hoegg UR. Cigarette smoke in closed spaces. Environ Health Perspect 1972;2:117-28.

6. Kim MJ, Kim CH, Kim YH, Kang JH. Relationship between passive smoke and urinary cotinine level. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28:379-82. Korean.

7. Kim HJ, Lim YW, Lee SJ, Park SE, Kim CS, Hong CS, et al. Relationship between environmental tobacco smoke and urinary cotinine levels in passive smokers at their residence. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004;14 Suppl 1:S65-70.

8. Park YS, Roh YM, Kim CN. Urinary cotinine concentration by passive smoking in the PC game room. Korean J Environ Health Soc 2002;28:11-20.

9. Tang JL, Law M, Wald N. How effective is nicotine replacement therapy in helping people to stop smoking? BMJ 1994;308:21-6.

10. Benowitz NL. Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Epidemiol Rev 1996;18:188-204.

11. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health 1987;77:1435-8.

12. Hukkanen J, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev 2005;57:79-115.

13. Heinrich J, Holscher B, Seiwert M, Carty CL, Merkel G, Schulz C. Nicotine and cotinine in adults' urine: the german environmental survey 1998. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2005;15: 74-80.

14. Lazcano-Ponce E, Benowitz N, Sanchez- Zamorano LM, Barbosa-Sanchez L, Valdes- Salgado R, Jacob P 3rd, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure in Mexican discotheques. Nicotine Tob Res 2007;9:1021-6.